Benita Ferrero-Waldner studied jurisprudence and received her doctor's decree in 1970. She started her diplomatic career in the Austrian Foreign Ministry in 1984. In May 1995 she became Secretary of State in the Austrian Foreign Ministry and in February 2000 finally Austrian Foreign Minister.
At the latest in year 2000, when she was also the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office for one year, Benita Ferrero-Waldner had to familiarize herself professionally with Belarus. One of her statements out of this time (source: osce.org) reads like this:
VIENNA, 17 October 2000 - The following statement regarding the Belarus parliamentary elections was issued by OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Austrian Foreign Minister Ferrero-Waldner.
The OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Foreign Minister Ferrero-Waldner, regrets that - according to a statement of the ODIHR Technical Assessment Mission - the 15 October 2000 parliamentary elections process in Belarus failed to meet international standards for democratic elections.
The Chairperson-in-Office takes note of the measures undertaken by the Belarusian Government in the run-up to the parliamentary elections leading to an improvement and a greater transparency of the electoral process. Although progress had been made to meet international standards for democratic elections, the implementation of the four criteria agreed by European institutions has to be considered insufficient to recognise these elections to be free and democratic.
In April 2004, she was running as the canditate in presidential elections for the conservative party ÖVP. Though the additional support of the right-wing party FPÖ led by Jörg Haider, Ferrero-Waldner failed her target. Half a year later, she became Member of the European Commission in charge of External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy in November 2004.
On 5th April 2006, EU Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner held a speech in European Parliament in Strassbourgh, refering to the presidential elections in Belarus. There she said:
The OSCE/ODIHIR initial report concludes, that the election failed to meet OSCE standards for democratic elections. This was due to the arbitrary use of state power and widespread detentions; a disregard for the basic right for freedom of assembly, association and expression; and problems with early voting, counting and tabulation.
The Commission therefore considers the election as fundamentally flawed. (source: www.europarl.europa,eu)
In the end of this speech she said:
We must continue to apply pressure; demand the release of all those held for political reasons; and insist Belarus lives up to it's international commitment as a member of the OSCE and the United Nations.
The violent suppression of peaceful protests and detention of political opponents and protesters have no part in democratic societies. We must hold firm and show Belarus and it's people, that an alternative - a democratic open future - is possible. The EU will support them all the way.
ALL THE WAY?
On initiative of the EU Commission, the European Council suspended in October 2008 the travelling ban, which was imposed on Aleksander Lukashenko in 2006, as EU sanction for rigged presidential elections in Belarus. On 16th February 2009, Javier Solana, Secretary-General of the EU Council and High Representative of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, adressed Aleksander Lukashenko as MR. PRESIDENT during his first visit in Minsk.
It was exactly the same Javier Solana, who had earmarked the presidential elections in Belarus as 'fraudulent' in 2006. Mr. Solana did'nt mention the 2006 elections and also not the elections, which fell short of OSCE standards in September 2008. Mr. Solana did'nt talk with Lukashenko about human rights or democracy. Which European Values did Solana represent in Minsk? Did he represent European Values at all?
There was also a Minsk-visit of Benita Ferrero-Waldner on the EU agenda, scheduled for 12th February 2009. Maybe this was the reason, why the EU Commissioner did not protest, when the Belarusian human rights defender Yana Palyakova was sentenced in a politically motivated trial to RESTRAINT OF LIBERTY for a term of 2 1/2 years on 3rd February 2009. Was this the EU support ALL THE WAY, which was promised by Ferrero-Waldner?
The EU Commissioner even did not cancel her Minsk visit, after this politically persecuted human rights defender died on 7th of March 2009. The decision for to postpone the visit was made FOUR DAYS LATER, on 11th March 2009! Does'nt this indicate clearly, that the death of Yana Palyakovski was'nt an immediate reason for Ferrero-Waldner to postpone her visit in Minsk? Does anybody understand such an inhuman cynism?
Until today, there was not a single word of regret expressed by Benita Ferrero-Waldner on behalf of the judiciary victim Yana Palyakova. Was'nt it the proactive diplomacy of Ferrero-Waldner, which made it possible, that the EU tolerated all the politically motivated senctences in Belarus, which are known as RESTRAINT OF LIBERTY?
Was'nt it the silence of Javier Solana and Benita Ferrero-Waldner, which was deadly for Yana Palyakova? Did'nt they give the Lukashenko diplomatic rear cover for to hide his political victims in alternative facilities and in home arrests?
Benita Ferrero-Waldner and Yana Palyakova, both studied jursiprudence. They never met, but their stories of life and death will be connected forever, since the silence created by the one was deadly for the other.
Today is Day of Solidarity in Belarus. Today the EU Council will decide in Brussels, if the Lukashenko regime will be included into the Eastern Partnership of the European Union. -16th March 2009. Will they remain Brussels remain silent?